Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Mar 2009 11:48 UTC, submitted by PLan
In the News In a move that would certainly shake up the computer industry quite a bit, IBM is reportedly in talks with Sun Microsystems about the possibility of IBM acquiring Sun. Sun is going through hard times at the moment, and has been actively looking for someone to be acquired by.
Thread beginning with comment 353691
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Solaris is dead.
by Windows Sucks on Wed 18th Mar 2009 19:49 UTC in reply to "RE: Solaris is dead. "
Windows Sucks
Member since:
2005-11-10

What makes the Linux kernel flexible is how easy it is to port it. As you know its been ported to almost every hardware configuration you can think of. From Phones, to set top boxes to PC's to Super Computers.

Solaris has been ported to what? X86 sparc and maybe one or two other platforms.

Yes Open Solaris has a much bigger HAL then Solaris proper, Linux can be ported quickly to almost anything you throw at it.

The other flexibility is that no one company controls it so there are no restraints to what you can do to it. So for the customer or random developer you can do whatever you want with it. It doesn't fall under some restrictive Sun (IBM) license. Notice that there are tons of versions of linux and even the linux kernel. When open solaris was first talked about people acted like Slow Laris was so much better then Linux and when it went open source that would be the death of Linux. LOL! Not.

No one serious has given Open Solaris a good look. Meaning that hosting companies still push Linux, companies that sell virtual servers still push Linux, companies doing cloud computing still push Linux.

Open Solaris has not taken off and Solaris proper is dieing.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Solaris is dead.
by kaiwai on Wed 18th Mar 2009 20:50 in reply to "RE[2]: Solaris is dead. "
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

What makes the Linux kernel flexible is how easy it is to port it. As you know its been ported to almost every hardware configuration you can think of. From Phones, to set top boxes to PC's to Super Computers.

Solaris has been ported to what? X86 sparc and maybe one or two other platforms.


What has that go to to do with the price of fish? The problem with Solaris isn't the lack of technology, it is the lack of leadership within Sun to bring all the products together in a cohensive offering to customers so that a solution can work out of the box rather than having to spend thousands on assembling the individual componens oneself.

There is a reason why Windows has made a jump in marketshare on the server - people want turnkey solutions and Sun is still stuck in the day when the likes of SCO were charging extra on their products for the TCP/IP stack, UFS support and individual components. Customers don't want that, they want an out of the box turn key solution.

Yes Open Solaris has a much bigger HAL then Solaris proper, Linux can be ported quickly to almost anything you throw at it.


Who uses HAL? neither Linux nor OpenSolaris uses HAL; OpenSolaris have good separation between platform specific code and agnostic code but you could hardly qualify a smart programming decision as equating to the implementation and use of a HAL akin to that of Windows NT line.

The other flexibility is that no one company controls it so there are no restraints to what you can do to it. So for the customer or random developer you can do whatever you want with it. It doesn't fall under some restrictive Sun (IBM) license. Notice that there are tons of versions of linux and even the linux kernel. When open solaris was first talked about people acted like Slow Laris was so much better then Linux and when it went open source that would be the death of Linux. LOL! Not.

No one serious has given Open Solaris a good look. Meaning that hosting companies still push Linux, companies that sell virtual servers still push Linux, companies doing cloud computing still push Linux.

Open Solaris has not taken off and Solaris proper is dieing.


Just because something is popular or well marketed doesn't mean that the product is inherently superior.

I wish people would spend a bit of time to ask themselves why Linux originally took off in the first place - based on its early beginnings 12 years ago instead of listening to rabid fanboys like yourself who jumped on the Linux bandwagon in the last 3-4 years. If you understand why Linux took off then you'd realise why dimissing OpenSolaris or any other opensource alternative is a stupid precept at best.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Solaris is dead.
by rajj on Wed 18th Mar 2009 21:24 in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris is dead. "
rajj Member since:
2005-07-06

Except that everyone should have learned by now that turn key solutions are a really bad joke.

The Oracle PeopleSoft HR/Academic Records product was supposed to be a system wide turn key solution for the California State University system. Billions of dollars, a decade and a multitude of consultant firms later, it still doesn't work.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Solaris is dead.
by Moulinneuf on Thu 19th Mar 2009 00:07 in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris is dead. "
Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

I wish people would spend a bit of time to ask themselves why Linux originally took off in the first place


It's Free Software , that's why it took off , you got real community and commercial involvment witch you don't get in so called **Open Source**.

MIT ... Open Source.
BSD ... Open Source
Open Solaris ... Open Source.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Solaris is dead.
by Windows Sucks on Thu 19th Mar 2009 00:17 in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris is dead. "
Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

[q]What has that go to to do with the price of fish? The problem with Solaris isn't the lack of technology, it is the lack of leadership within Sun to bring all the products together in a cohensive offering to customers so that a solution can work out of the box rather than having to spend thousands on assembling the individual componens oneself.

There is a reason why Windows has made a jump in marketshare on the server - people want turnkey solutions and Sun is still stuck in the day when the likes of SCO were charging extra on their products for the TCP/IP stack, UFS support and individual components. Customers don't want that, they want an out of the box turn key solution.


Windows marketshare on the server is only large for workgroup serving. They took out Novell and Banyan for that market. Not any Unix or Linux products. Super computing is Linux, Webhosting is Linux, Email hosting is Linux, a lot of home and office networking is Linux.

Yes Open Solaris has a much bigger HAL then Solaris proper, Linux can be ported quickly to almost anything you throw at it.


I didn't mean HAL, I meant HCL That was a typo.

Also I didn't say that Solaris was not good. What I said was the Linux was more flexible.. Meaning you can do more with it, you can use it on more hardware, the license is more flexible etc. Companies want that, companies like that, which is why Red Hat is killing Sun. Oh and lets talk about some other stuff that actually does suck with Solaris! The compiler!!! Sucks. The way you patch and install software in Solaris sucks!! (Which is why they had to get Linux guys to come on and show them how to try and make solaris more Linux like) the OS install process SUCKS!

Oh and lets look at BSD. Why did BSD not take off like Linux? It was around before Linux (Like Solaris) Because still BSD is just not as flexible nor is the license. People always say "The BSD is better, the license is better" Yeah the license is better for companies like MS to come along and steal code and ideas and not give 1 line of code back! (Which happened)

Oh and I am not a Johnny come lately Linux or other OS fan boy. I am a a LONG time Linux user that was using Linux when Metro X was the config tool. When Caldera was cool and Banyan was the number one workgroup server environment. So I was around when Linux got popular, I helped it get there by replacing Windows servers, Unix servers and Novell servers for my customers with Linux. And I said months ago that Sun was done, Solaris was done. When a company like Red Hat makes less then half the money you do but has close to the market cap, there is a MAJOR problem.

Any way if IBM buys Sun, Solaris will be dead. Might want to get on the Linux bandwagon while we are still accepting members. LOL!

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Solaris is dead.
by google_ninja on Wed 18th Mar 2009 20:50 in reply to "RE[2]: Solaris is dead. "
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

You are right that noone really cares about solaris outside of high end servers, but I don't think sun is crying over it. Whether or not Solaris runs on iPods is completely irrelevant to how well it runs on the high end servers it was designed for.

I do get where you are coming from, but I think it is an odd point to bring up. The best operating systems (imho) are the ones that focus on a single task and do it very well, not the ones that do everything in an average way.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Solaris is dead.
by Moulinneuf on Thu 19th Mar 2009 00:10 in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris is dead. "
Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

Then why is it SUN who is getting sold today ...

The one making the most money , tru illegal and criminal move , is Microsoft anyway. They don't focus on one single task ... It's also not trusted on anything that need to be secure.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Solaris is dead.
by Windows Sucks on Thu 19th Mar 2009 00:31 in reply to "RE[3]: Solaris is dead. "
Windows Sucks Member since:
2005-11-10

You are right that noone really cares about solaris outside of high end servers, but I don't think sun is crying over it. Whether or not Solaris runs on iPods is completely irrelevant to how well it runs on the high end servers it was designed for.

I do get where you are coming from, but I think it is an odd point to bring up. The best operating systems (imho) are the ones that focus on a single task and do it very well, not the ones that do everything in an average way.


Problem is that in the Data center Red Hat is eating Solaris up. On high end servers like supercomputers Linux beats the next OS 5 to 1

Remember MS has never had the best OS but they have pushed it right. Linux can do everything Solaris can. Maybe not as good yet but Linux distros are getting better and better. Plus you loose the lock in. Don't like Red Hat support then you just roll to CentOS or Oracle Unbreakable Linux.

Also you say Sun is not crying that Solaris doesn't do all the 50 things Linux can do but Sun hired people like Ian Murdock to help make Open Solaris more like Linux. And then try to be like Red Hat with Fedora and roll the changes back up to the main line Solaris.

You are very right it is a strange point but geek guys love the fact that Linux can run on a coffee pot. LOL!

Reply Parent Score: 1