Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Mar 2009 22:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 353920
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Gnome could move a bit faster
by cmost on Thu 19th Mar 2009 16:13
in reply to "RE: Gnome could move a bit faster"
"With all the excitement surrounding the new KDE 4.x, it would be nice to see a little excitement coming out of the Gnome camp about now;
Well, I must say that "excitement" is an interesting word to use. "Spin", "Propaganda", and "Hype" seem more accurately descriptive terms to me. You wan't Gnome to spend 4 years taking 10 steps back and then another year (and counting) trying to catch up to where they were before?
The evolutionary vs revolutionary strategy of Gnome development is part and parcel of the professionalism you refer to. "
If you're going to quote me and then seem to belittle me (as is your usual modus operandi,) please don't "forget" to include all of my words so as to keep what I said in context. You'll notice that I said "albeit not too much excitement mind you..." which clearly indicate my desire to see Gnome progress a bit faster but without the major shakeup that took place when KDE moved from 3.x to 4.x.
RE[3]: Gnome could move a bit faster
by sbergman27 on Thu 19th Mar 2009 16:26
in reply to "RE[2]: Gnome could move a bit faster"




Member since:
2005-07-24
Well, I must say that "excitement" is an interesting word to use. "Spin", "Propaganda", and "Hype" seem more accurately descriptive terms to me. You wan't Gnome to spend 4 years taking 10 steps back and then another year (and counting) trying to catch up to where they were before?
The evolutionary vs revolutionary strategy of Gnome development is part and parcel of the professionalism you refer to.