Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Mar 2009 06:44 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Thread beginning with comment 353936
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-26
That is why in the real world you are way way more secure running a Linux distro with SELinux enabled throughout (like Fedora) or AppArmor, Smack etc. Or maybe even better OpenBSD (similar security, even less marketshare)
That is true(only marketshare has nothing to do with it as long as you don't use windows), but most people get carried away by benchmarks. OpenBSD won't ever compare favorably to Windows or vanilla Linux in benchmarks. And people want their games and browsers and videos at 3000 fps.
If you want your OS to be used, you cannot start putting canaries in your stack, making allocations with byte granularity and randomizing the positions of everything.
Linux has gotten a bit better lately, and there is SELinux(ahem), but I don't see a default Ubuntu installation ever including half of it.
As long as you can more or less follow an introduction to Hacking tutorial with your OS it means it is insecure as hell and you are just lucky of not having been targeted yet.