Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Mar 2009 06:44 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Thread beginning with comment 354011
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-18
Not every exploit is reliable. Sometimes you have checked your exploit very carefully, and they have something ever so slightly different. Some exploits are very reliable or simple and take no work or jiggling of the handle (like IIS Unicode/Code Red.) It just worked. The fact that he walked in and threw down on Safari, means it is probably a reliable exploit.
I don't know how long it took for the other exploits, it may be telling if we find out. I'm guessing it wasn't 10 seconds for the others. If it was, the headline would be everything pwned in 30 seconds! The IE/Windows 7 exploit was described as brilliant I think, which may mean it was not easy, or quick to execute. It may have taken several delicate steps to get access.