Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354161
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-27
well at least i hope that they are and that's the impression which i got.
leopard broughts lots of new security features like sandboxing, mandatory access controls, address space randomization, application signing and execution protection:
http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/MacOSX_Leopard_Security_TB.pdf
but it seems like they only laid some of the ground work and didn't really implement it:
http://www.laconicsecurity.com/aslr-leopard-versus-vista.html
still way to go, but they not just sitting on their lazy ass either.
Edited 2009-03-20 17:48 UTC