Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 19:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 354227
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Totally inaccurate
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 22:16
in reply to "Totally inaccurate "
What would be better, is, if Thom can come up with a poll that asks what our preferences for a Primary OS and Primary browser are.
After all, in work, I WISH I was using something else.
After all, in work, I WISH I was using something else.
Uhm, this isn't about what you WANT to use. These statistics are not meant to look into the minds of people and find out what they WANT to use.
The statistics show with what platforms and browsers people access OSNews. That's all they do. Nothing more, nothing less. They are not useless. You find them useless because you expect these statistics to give you information on something they cannot give you information about.
Similarly, a poll, as you suggest, does not provide us with the data that the statistics provide us with. They measure two completely different things.
Is the difference really that hard to understand? I'm intrigued.
RE[2]: Totally inaccurate
by raver31 on Fri 20th Mar 2009 22:43
in reply to "RE: Totally inaccurate "
RE[2]: Totally inaccurate
by Agent69 on Mon 23rd Mar 2009 16:28
in reply to "RE: Totally inaccurate "




Member since:
2005-07-06
Stats can always be manipulated to say whatever you want, we all know this.
This example is pretty useless, I browse the site on my main machine, and my secondary laptop, and my work machine.
My main machine dual boots between Ubuntu and PC-BSD, my laptop between Ubuntu and WinXP and my work machine between XP and Vista.
So I will be showing up with a few skewed results.
What would be better, is, if Thom can come up with a poll that asks what our preferences for a Primary OS and Primary browser are.
After all, in work, I WISH I was using something else.