Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354253
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
On the other hand, shouldn't it be Apples responsibility to make sure their customers don't get royally screwed. If Apple really cared they'd pay the money to hire people like Mr Miller. If Apple has such a lax approach to security why should other people do Apple's job for free.
That is almost like saying that the financial scandals that have occurred over the last several decades aren't due to the individuals lack of morals but due to a lack of regulation; that some how individuals aren't accountable for their own actions because they need regulation to guide them because they don't have the capacity to make moral judgements on their own. Its a way of mitigating individual responsibility and transferring this responsibility ultimately to the victim.
Its like saying, "you were shot by that gentleman, its your fault for not wearing a bullet proof vest".
Edited 2009-03-21 00:34 UTC