Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354261
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-26
OpenBSD has a lot of measures no other OS uses or has started to use only recently(eg. ASLR in Win and Linux) which make the very few bugs very difficult(as in almost impossible) to exploit.
As the interviewee makes clear, it is this sort of thing, ASLR, sandboxes, stack canaries, etc. that make an attacker's life difficult.
*BSD and MacOS X have been disregarding those features because they negatively affect performance, and now they are reaping the fruits of shame.
Bugs might be a lot or a handful, but if you do nothing to keep the attackers' from playing around with your unpatched bugs, the game is over for you.