Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354287
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
If it was, Chrome would have the same vulnerabilities as Safari.
Please learn to shut up when you don't know what you're talking about.
If a vulnerability lies in WebKit, what about open source would say that Google didn't modify WebKit?
You're right that Safari isn't totally open source but that doesn't mean that the vulnerabilities aren't in the open source portions.
I don't use Safari on either platform because I don't trust Apple since they don't seem to care. Mozilla's Firefox developers care more but there are still plenty of vulnerabilities and it's completely open source and users still get hosed.