Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354324
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Let's keep moving
by nathbeadle on Sat 21st Mar 2009 15:55
in reply to "RE: Let's keep moving"
I'm not at all saying Apple is ignoring security. I feel happy with Mac OS X very much.
What I am saying is that companies for the most part tend to see these things as bad press (and for a legit reason as that is what everyone spins it as).
All I'm hoping is for Apple to take this and say "Hey, let's keep moving on security and fix these things up". The last thing I'd want to happen is have Apple come out and downplay something that is now in the open.
Companies tend to clam up when these things happen and I'd love to see them acknowledge these and get them plugged... to keep moving forward!




Member since:
2009-03-21
It's wrong to suggest that Apple is somehow ignoring the evolving security climate. Known exploits are regularly patched and the underlying OS keeps getting new security enhancements like •File Quarantine •Sandbox •Package and Code Signing •Application Firewall •Non-Executable (NX) Data •Address Space Randomization
For more info, see Jordan Hubbard's talk on the evolution of OS X at http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa08/tech/hubbard_talk.pdf
OS X doesn't have to be the most secure OS. It just has to be secure enough to keep criminal attention focused on Windows. Just remember that security and usability are often mutually exclusive, so all vendors are forced to balance the need to not inconvenience users with the need to be secure. If that were not the case we'd all be using PGP-enabled mail clients, every web stream would be SSL encrypted, we'd all be using multi-factor authentication, all our hard drives would have full-disk encryption, etc. etc.