Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354588
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Operating System Security
by middleware on Tue 24th Mar 2009 00:15
in reply to "RE[4]: Operating System Security"
It's hard to prove the architecture of a proprietary software, especially like Microsoft. So be cautious to say *no way* to any method Microsoft would do in. Even when something are installed separately, it may in the kernel. VM software are installed separately, but it is usually part of them has to be running in kernel.
I think you do not have to be surprised if Microsoft put anything that obviously should be user-space feature into kernel, because they can and they did. They internally claim to each other it is for performance sake and sometimes that misconception even leak to marketing.
Again, I don't know if IE is in or not in kernel, but I denounce the way too quick to say no way.




Member since:
2007-01-18
Some people seem to think that because Microsoft said that it was integral to the OS and couldn't be removed that must mean that it was in the kernel. I'd say that the Windows login is integral to the OS, but there's no way that that's in the kernel. I don't see why IE would have to be in the kernel for Microsoft to claim that it was integral and unremovable.
Now, granted I don't know what is and isn't in the kernel in any particular version of Windows, but I'd be very surprised if an internet browser was ever in any kernel of any operating system.