Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 18:02 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
GNU, GPL, Open Source Eric S. Raymond is one of the three big figures in open source, together with Linus Torvalds and Richard Stallman. During a talk for the Long Island Linux User Group, he made some interesting statements about the GPL, namely that the GPL is no longer needed due to the way the open source movement works.
Thread beginning with comment 354851
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: BSD ?
by Beta on Tue 24th Mar 2009 21:31 UTC in reply to "RE: BSD ?"
Beta
Member since:
2005-07-06

There are lots of projects that use BSD/MIT licenses, and are still active. Some names come to mind: Postgres, xorg, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Firefox, WebKit, GHC.


You are mistaken about Firefox as it is tri-licensed under GPL, LGPL, and MPL.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: BSD ?
by sbenitezb on Tue 24th Mar 2009 21:34 in reply to "RE[2]: BSD ?"
sbenitezb Member since:
2005-07-22

You are mistaken about Firefox as it is tri-licensed under GPL, LGPL, and MPL.


I'm not, the MPL still applies. Also, I wonder why I'm being modded down so fast. Does telling the truth shake some neurons?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: BSD ?
by azrael29a on Wed 25th Mar 2009 23:36 in reply to "RE[3]: BSD ?"
azrael29a Member since:
2008-02-26

"You are mistaken about Firefox as it is tri-licensed under GPL, LGPL, and MPL.


I'm not, the MPL still applies. Also, I wonder why I'm being modded down so fast. Does telling the truth shake some neurons?
"
Why don't you read the MPL in the first place? MPL is not BSD.
MPL is a weak copyleft license. Source code copied or changed under the MPL must stay under the MPL.

Reply Parent Score: 1