Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 18:02 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 354937
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2008-05-22
Apple's Darwin is a perfect example of how open source doesn't work. Yes, sources are available and the Darwin kernel is very similar (but not identical) to the Mac OS X kernel, but at the same time, Darwin's sources are read-only. Apple has proven many times to just ignore contributions.
If developers next to never can get their contributions into Mac OS X and into the machines of a wider audience, why would a person consider contributing something at all? As a result, contributions stalled and neither a GPL nor a BSD-style licence will help.
An example of where Apple does better is gcc. gcc is strong enough to exist independently of Apple's mercy.