Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 18:02 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 355033
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I don't understand ESR to be fair. Basically, he says that we should use the BSD because no company wants to close their source code. So, if nobody wants to close the source code...why would people move away from the GPL, which keeps it open anyway?
Because the BSD license is more flexible, and you can use BSD licensed code within your already-proprietary products without any issues, but you can't do the same for GPL code (or, at least that's how it was explained to me, a lay person).
"
GPL doesn't care about your proprietary programs. It doesn't need them.
GPL doesn't care about your proprietary programs. It doesn't need them.
What I said was you cannot use source code under the GPL with proprietary-licensed or closed-source code, but you can do that with BSD licensed code. The latter makes open source code more appealing for integrating with already-proprietary systems because they will not have to re-license their system and/or open the source up for the world to view their trade secrets [or whatever].





Member since:
2007-01-04
Because the BSD license is more flexible, and you can use BSD licensed code within your already-proprietary products without any issues, but you can't do the same for GPL code (or, at least that's how it was explained to me, a lay person).
Edited to add quote.
Edited 2009-03-25 20:56 UTC