Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Mar 2009 18:57 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 355067
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think it all goes back to 4.0 being a testing release. It didn't make sense during the early, bug-fixing period of KDE4 to start thinking already about new features. The fact that they're now asking for feature requests suggests that the desktop environment is now "ready". The website provides a forum where users and devs can get together to debate new features. This strikes me as being a more productive way of approaching the problem than the scattering of mailing list posts and bug reports. I think you should give it a chance to fail rather than declaring it DOA.
This is more or less reasonable. The only other point to make is that, in an entirely similar fashion to KDE 4.0, both KDE 3.0 and GNOME 2.0 were "not ready".
Well, now, at KDE 4.2.1, KDE4 has caught and passed KDE3 and GNOME. So lets forget the debate that tries to say that KDE 4.0 should not have been released to users (despite the fact that KDE 3.0 and GNOME 2.0 were both released to users) and just get on with the innovation and excitement that is KDE4.




Member since:
2005-07-01
I think it all goes back to 4.0 being a testing release. It didn't make sense during the early, bug-fixing period of KDE4 to start thinking already about new features. The fact that they're now asking for feature requests suggests that the desktop environment is now "ready".
The website provides a forum where users and devs can get together to debate new features. This strikes me as being a more productive way of approaching the problem than the scattering of mailing list posts and bug reports.
I think you should give it a chance to fail rather than declaring it DOA.