Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Mar 2009 18:53 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Linux Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst questioned the relevance of Linux on the desktop, citing several financial and interoperability hurdles to business adoption at a panel on end-users and Linux last night at the OSBC.
Thread beginning with comment 355126
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Interesting Comments
by dimosd on Thu 26th Mar 2009 04:01 UTC in reply to "Interesting Comments"
dimosd
Member since:
2006-02-10

Otherwise, I don't know how else you do it. Linux has made definite improvements, but it's still such a mess. I have Ubuntu dual booting on my old Dell, but I haven't booted into it in like six months. There's just nothing for me there.


Heh... Yesterday I wrote a 3 line patch for an open source program, to make it behave according to my needs. I couldn't possibly have done it with Windows or MacOSX...

But good luck to those who try... and to those who keep plugging away at it


Unlike 99.9% of people on earth right now, I am simply not interested in owning hardware I can't tweak. I guess I am just weird, but I like computers

Edited 2009-03-26 04:12 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: Interesting Comments
by Coxy on Thu 26th Mar 2009 11:34 in reply to "RE: Interesting Comments"
Coxy Member since:
2006-07-01

Heh... Yesterday I wrote a 3 line patch for an open source program, to make it behave according to my needs. I couldn't possibly have done it with Windows or MacOSX...


... and you wouldn't need to either because they don't take 10 years to make it 1.0 and don't stay in perpetual beta/alpha states like open source software.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Interesting Comments
by darknexus on Thu 26th Mar 2009 12:28 in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting Comments"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

No, most closed source software slaps a 1.0 version number on it whether it's ready or not, because their marketing department determines it must be released on a certain date. Even when that's not the case, there's generally not enough testing done at most x.0 releases no matter if you're talking open or closed source. Want a good example of a closed source, piece of crap software? iTunes version 8.1, have a look at that. Oh, it looks slick, sure, but they made some serious regressions in the QA department between 8.0.2 and 8.1, and that's not even a .0 release.
Open or closed source isn't what determines a good product, it's design and testing that distinguishes a piece of crap from a work of good engineering. I've seen some closed source software that absolutely sucked, and I've seen some that was excellent, likewise with open source software.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[3]: Interesting Comments
by dbolgheroni on Thu 26th Mar 2009 15:51 in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting Comments"
dbolgheroni Member since:
2007-01-18

"Wow, Windows is almost at level (opz, version) 7 where Linux is still at version 2! Wow, how advanced it is!"

A lot of 0.x free software works a lot better than the market 7.x, 8.x, etc.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Interesting Comments
by melgross on Sat 28th Mar 2009 18:38 in reply to "RE: Interesting Comments"
melgross Member since:
2005-08-12

The difficulty is that when talking about Linux for the desktop, we're talking about people who CAN'T write a few lines of code to fix some "problem" for themselves.

It always seems to be the nerds who run about talking about Linux for the desktop, forgetting that 99.9% of the computer using population couldn't care less about what nerds think.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1