Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Mar 2009 17:07 UTC, submitted by Anil Gulecha

Thread beginning with comment 355289
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Laurence
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Fri 27th Mar 2009 02:37
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by Doc Pain on Fri 27th Mar 2009 04:13
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by Slapo on Fri 27th Mar 2009 06:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by anilg on Fri 27th Mar 2009 08:18
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
Though NCP is server focussed, we have XFCE4 and gnome-core for NCP2.. so you can install these WMs.
http://www.nexenta.org/os/FAQ#head-dd78578189a3eaf21a70dff59c9a2d1b...
-Anil
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by Kebabbert on Fri 27th Mar 2009 14:00
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[4]: Comment by Laurence
by Laurence on Fri 27th Mar 2009 17:27
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Laurence"
Yeah, but I want Zfs + gnu toolchain + gui.
FreeBSD's toolchain isn't that much different to Linux's.
But if it has to be Linux, then run ZFS via FUSE. Just don't expect the same speeds you'd get with native kernel support.
However, I still think you're selling FreeBSD short. It's a wonderful OS
Member since:
2007-03-26
That would be because it's not targetted for desktop use.
If you want desktop Solaris then you'd be better off with OpenSolaris.
Failing that, there's also FreeBSD - which supports ZFS and has 'jails' (FreeBSD's equivelent to Solaris Zones) as well as an already proven track record of success on the desktop.
No apt-get though, but the ports system is as good as it is different from Debian.