Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Mar 2009 21:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 355517
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm not going to sue Ford when they sell me a car full of features but also full of cheap plastic parts that tend to break.
Bad for you. At least you should get Ford to replace those parts that break. After all, you don't actually pay for shit, even if they sell you shit, you have rights as a consumer.
Why is it any different with computers? Because it is too technical?
The consumer needs to educate themselves before purchasing products. First and foremost learn the phrase "You get what you pay for."
The consumer needs to educate themselves before purchasing products. First and foremost learn the phrase "You get what you pay for."
The problem is not that people doesn't have right to sue. It's nobody does it because nobody actually cares or really wants to go trough all the pain and money wasting on demands. But I bet you those hardware companies would go down the drain if more people started sueing for the crap they sell to the world.






Member since:
2005-07-06
It all comes down to the consumer actually doing research before they buy a product.
I'm not going to sue Ford when they sell me a car full of features but also full of cheap plastic parts that tend to break.
Why is it any different with computers? Because it is too technical?
The consumer needs to educate themselves before purchasing products. First and foremost learn the phrase "You get what you pay for."
Now Microsoft should come down hard on Acer for selling their OS on crap PCs, but in the end there is very little Microsoft can do except to stop selling Acer their software.