Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Mar 2009 21:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 355737
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The emperor has no clothes.
by tupp on Sun 29th Mar 2009 18:02
in reply to "RE: The emperor has no clothes."
Some people want choice, others want quality.
Not sure what this statement implies, but it sounds like RDF logic. Are quality and theme choice mutually exclusive?
Please explain how the lack of theme color choices equates to better quality.
... I use the defaults and I'm pretty happy with them.
Mac users had better be happy with the Mac defaults -- they have no choice.
Contrast that with my 15 years of using Windows and 10 years of Linux, where no matter how much I changed themes, I was never happy with them for more than a week.
The problem might not lie with the OS/GUI.
I'm not saying that the MacOS theme is perfect, but seems to be good enough.
No single theme is perfect for most people nor for most situations (e.g. dark edit bays, sunny bedrooms, etc.), which is why theme/color choice is imperative.
Why can't themes/colors be as individual as the individuals who use them?
And I'm glad I can't tweak it too much, otherwise the small imperfections would trigger my latent OCD and I would be wasting my time doing what I used to do with those other two OSes.
Perhaps Macs are best for those with neuroses.
Edited 2009-03-29 18:04 UTC
RE[3]: The emperor has no clothes.
by CrLf on Sun 29th Mar 2009 18:24
in reply to "RE[2]: The emperor has no clothes."
Not sure what this statement implies, but it sounds like RDF logic. Are quality and theme choice mutually exclusive?
Unfortunately, giving users choice is often used in software as a means of releasing developers/designers from the burden of producing good, well thought, defaults. In the particular case of themes, the most customizable environments also seem to have the most hideous defaults.
I'm not saying that the lack of choice is a good thing. But if the users aren't complaining about it, then the defaults must be good, otherwise they would just go somewhere else.





Member since:
2006-01-03
Some people want choice, others want quality. I've been a Mac user for only 6 months, but I've never felt the need to make any changes to the theme (not even the subltle color choices that are available). Other than the desktop wallpaper, I use the defaults and I'm pretty happy with them.
Contrast that with my 15 years of using Windows and 10 years of Linux, where no matter how much I changed themes, I was never happy with them for more than a week.
I'm not saying that the MacOS theme is perfect, but seems to be good enough. And I'm glad I can't tweak it too much, otherwise the small imperfections would trigger my latent OCD and I would be wasting my time doing what I used to do with those other two OSes.