Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Thread beginning with comment 355846
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: There is no argument
by darknexus on Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:47 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: There is no argument"
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

Thing is, most people get confused over what is part of GNOME and what is part of their distribution's standard GNOME environment. Hense these misconceptions that GNOME-Do is part of GNOME standard and that GNOME depends on Mono, etc etc...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: There is no argument
by sbergman27 on Mon 30th Mar 2009 19:53 in reply to "RE[3]: There is no argument"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Thing is, most people get confused over what is part of GNOME and what is part of their distribution's standard GNOME environment.

Agreed. But what distros include GnomeDo? The *buntus don't. And I don't think Fedora does. To be sure, it is available in Universe. But is not blessed. And certainly is not installed by default.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: There is no argument
by lemur2 on Mon 30th Mar 2009 22:10 in reply to "RE[4]: There is no argument"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"Thing is, most people get confused over what is part of GNOME and what is part of their distribution's standard GNOME environment.
Agreed. But what distros include GnomeDo? The *buntus don't. And I don't think Fedora does. To be sure, it is available in Universe. But is not blessed. And certainly is not installed by default. "

This is true. Agreed.

I find it quite strange, actually. Why does Ubuntu include the Mono libraries and yet not include GNOME Do?

It surely can't be that Ubuntu includes the Mono stuff just for the sake of TomBoy Notes and FSpot?

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[5]: There is no argument
by Melicerte on Tue 31st Mar 2009 10:28 in reply to "RE[4]: There is no argument"
Melicerte Member since:
2006-08-29

But what distros include GnomeDo?

Linux Mint 6, codenamed Felicia, does.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: There is no argument
by Lunitik on Mon 30th Mar 2009 22:19 in reply to "RE[3]: There is no argument"
Lunitik Member since:
2005-08-07

Gnome does depend on mono, via that Tomboy notes thing

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[5]: There is no argument
by Lobotomik on Tue 31st Mar 2009 06:33 in reply to "RE[4]: There is no argument"
Lobotomik Member since:
2006-01-03

*Ubuntu* depends on Mono, through the Tomboy thingie.

Reply Parent Score: 2