Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Thread beginning with comment 355854
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: There is no argument
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 30th Mar 2009 20:49 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: There is no argument"
Member since:

If I wrote an app called "KBabyMulcher", would that be a strong reason not to use KDE?

How about WinMulch? iMulch?

That depends - what are the licensing terms?

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: There is no argument
by Lunitik on Mon 30th Mar 2009 22:19 in reply to "RE[3]: There is no argument"
Lunitik Member since:

Licensing terms of Mono is the GPL... so clearly the argument goes deeper.

Reply Parent Score: 2