Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 21:19 UTC
Legal Navigation device maker TomTom and Microsoft have resolved their patent dispute by entering into a settlement agreement out-of-court. The outcome of the agreement is that TomTom will license the infringed patents, but that they will remove the encumbered code from their implementation of the Linux kernel within two years.
Thread beginning with comment 355916
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Mass Storage Device
by darknexus on Tue 31st Mar 2009 00:12 UTC in reply to "Mass Storage Device"
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

Doesn't strike me that an IFS driver would ruin that. Aside from installing the driver, there's no other reason it wouldn't operate as the same mass storage device and couldn't expose the same underlying files.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Mass Storage Device
by Ithamar on Tue 31st Mar 2009 04:54 in reply to "RE: Mass Storage Device"
Ithamar Member since:
2006-03-20

Except that this would only work on Windows, and, assuming they'll choose something that _generally available_ under Linux, that would still leave MacOS out in the cold (for which even the TomTom Desktop software is supported currently).

Not to mention platforms like Haiku, Syllable, and many other OSes that have a different file-system driver architecture then Windows....

Bottom line: FAT(32) seems to be the most generally available file-system on the planet.....

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Mass Storage Device
by darknexus on Tue 31st Mar 2009 13:29 in reply to "RE[2]: Mass Storage Device"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

I used IFS as an example, they could also write either a native filesystem driver for OS X or employ MacFuse towards the same end.
There's always UDF 1.02, which I actually have working quite well on my thumb drives once they're formatted properly.

Reply Parent Score: 2