Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 355916
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Mass Storage Device
by Ithamar on Tue 31st Mar 2009 04:54
in reply to "RE: Mass Storage Device"
Except that this would only work on Windows, and, assuming they'll choose something that _generally available_ under Linux, that would still leave MacOS out in the cold (for which even the TomTom Desktop software is supported currently).
Not to mention platforms like Haiku, Syllable, and many other OSes that have a different file-system driver architecture then Windows....
Bottom line: FAT(32) seems to be the most generally available file-system on the planet.....
RE[3]: Mass Storage Device
by darknexus on Tue 31st Mar 2009 13:29
in reply to "RE[2]: Mass Storage Device"




Member since:
2008-07-15
Doesn't strike me that an IFS driver would ruin that. Aside from installing the driver, there's no other reason it wouldn't operate as the same mass storage device and couldn't expose the same underlying files.