Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Thread beginning with comment 355945
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Surprised they didn't pick GNOME
by evangs on Tue 31st Mar 2009 06:48
in reply to "RE: Surprised they didn't pick GNOME"
" Where KDE has better technology, though, GNOME has proven stability, and backing from Red Hat, Novell, Sun... Granted, KDE now benefits from Nokia purchasing Trolltech, but I'm betting there's more money in GNOME.
Possibly so. That is why it is being "pushed" ... especially the inclusion of Mono into GNOME. Monied interests behind that, no doubt.
"
Yes, because we all have this aversion to money and commercial interests.




Member since:
2007-02-17
Well, there does seem to be a concerted effort going around trying to make it seem as though a lot of "users" were alienated.
The real fact of the matter, though, is that, in a fashion entirely similar to KDE 4.0, GNOME 2.0 and 2.2 were also broken releases, with most users sticking with GNOME 1.4, until it started to come good with GNOME 2.6.
Possibly so. That is why it is being "pushed" ... especially the inclusion of Mono into GNOME. Monied interests behind that, no doubt.
The interesting thing is, in the context of the topic of this thread, while GNOME is increasingly being laboured with Mono overhead, KDE 4.2.x (now including Qt 4.5) is getting slicker and quicker and cleaner all the time at a very encouraging pace.
Meanwhile, Qtcreator/Qt/C++/GCC reportedly lets one develop fast functional, good-looking and cross-platform (but still native) appliactions quickly, and it is now licensed as LGPL.