Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Thread beginning with comment 355948
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't understand what weakness it is that you think KDE has that GNOME does not have. GNOME applications are very poor performers under KDE, because they have to load massive GNOME libraries. Applications such as OpenOffice, Firefox and Thunderbird are the same on both KDE and GNOME, because they basically use the libraries of neither.
What's the difference?
What's the difference?
Massive GNOME libraries? Like what? Glib? It's tiny as are most GNOME libraries. In fact I can't quite figure out what massive library you could be referring to. Firefox and OpenOffice actually can use some GNOME libraries if you want to build support for it.
"I don't understand what weakness it is that you think KDE has that GNOME does not have. GNOME applications are very poor performers under KDE, because they have to load massive GNOME libraries. Applications such as OpenOffice, Firefox and Thunderbird are the same on both KDE and GNOME, because they basically use the libraries of neither. What's the difference?
Massive GNOME libraries? Like what? Glib? It's tiny as are most GNOME libraries. In fact I can't quite figure out what massive library you could be referring to. Firefox and OpenOffice actually can use some GNOME libraries if you want to build support for it. " Partial lists here:
(1) Platform Modules
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/apx-modules...
(2) Desktop Modules
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/apx-modules...
(3.1). Graphical Interfaces
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/graphics.ht...
(3.2). Virtual File System
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/gio.html.en
(3.3). Configuration and Lockdown
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/gconf.html....
(3.4). Internationalization
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/i18n.html.e...
(3.5). Accessibility
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/a11y.html.e...
(3.6). Multimedia
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/multimedia....
(3.7). Printing
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/printing.ht...
(4.1). Clipboards and Drag and Drop
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/clipboard.h...
(4.2). D-BUS Messaging
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/dbus.html.e...
(4.3). Bonobo and CORBA
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/bonobo-corb...
(4.4). Service Discovery
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/dns-sd.html...
(4.5). XML and Web Services
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/xml-web-ser...
More in:
Desktop technologies:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/desktop-tec...
Language bindings:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/bindings.ht...
Then, of course, lately there has been effectively added an extra 60MB or so of Mono libraries.





Member since:
2007-02-17
I don't understand what weakness it is that you think KDE has that GNOME does not have. GNOME applications are very poor performers under KDE, because they have to load massive GNOME libraries. Applications such as OpenOffice, Firefox and Thunderbird are the same on both KDE and GNOME, because they basically use the libraries of neither.
What's the difference?