Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Thread beginning with comment 355986
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

I don't believe you at all. You cannot have missed, over the years,the endless whining about names starting with a k (though the whiners are apparently fine with names starting with an i, an x, a g or a w).

It's a hoary, tired trope -- and one without any content to it.

Reply Parent Score: 3

rtfa Member since:

If thats all that bothers them then they must lead very trivial lives. I bet they believe the world is only 6000 years old as well

Reply Parent Score: 1

flynn Member since:

Somehow I did miss all of it, and all other prefixes bother me also. I dislike the names iTunes and iPhoto just as much as I dislike KOffice and KRunner.

I don't mind it when they come up with a regular name that happens to have a K in it, like Amarok or Okular or even Kaffeine. I just think it's sloppy when names only consist of a generic terms prefixed by a letter.

Reply Parent Score: 2

boudewijn Member since:

I don't think there has been a single story about KDE on OSNews, Slashdot, Ars Technica or pretty much anywhere that did not have a thread or two with people complaining about the k prefix. (Which, after all, is just the conventional way of naming applications used on Unix in the last decade of the previous millennium, when KDE was started.)

Reply Parent Score: 3