Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Mar 2009 18:43 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Any discussion about GNOME vs. KDE is sure to end in tears. It's basically impossible to discuss which of these two Free desktop environments is better than the other, mostly because they cater to different types of people, with different needs and expectatotions. As such, Bruce Byfield decided to look at the two platforms from a different perspective: if we consider their developmental processes, which of the two is most likely to be more successful in the coming years?
Thread beginning with comment 356171
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Hard to tell...
by Phucked on Wed 1st Apr 2009 01:22 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Hard to tell..."
Member since:

There has not been any recent benchmarks as much as i could see, however one of the reasons OpenMoko and Nokia dumped GTK for QT is because GTK is slower and uses more memory compared to QT

Reply Parent Score: 1