Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 1st Apr 2009 13:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 356244
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A BBC article summed it up nicely:
"Vincent Weafer, vice president of security response at anti-virus firm Symantec added: "We believe the software is geared towards making money. The characteristic of this type of worm is to keep it slow and low, keep it under the radar to slowly maximise profits over the long term."
"Vincent Weafer, vice president of security response at anti-virus firm Symantec added: "We believe the software is geared towards making money. The characteristic of this type of worm is to keep it slow and low, keep it under the radar to slowly maximise profits over the long term."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7976099.stm "
Couldn't we just apply his response to Symantec's own software? It seems more like exploits than upstanding utilities most of the time. I don't know of any other software that could be labeled as crashware so readily.




Member since:
2007-03-26
A BBC article summed it up nicely:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7976099.stm
Edited 2009-04-01 14:14 UTC