Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 16:12 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Gnome Only a few days ago, we ran an article on the future of KDE and GNOME, and which of the two had the brighter future based on their developmental processes. Barely has that discussion ended, or the GNOME engineering team comes with a pretty daunting plan to introduce a fairly massive reworking of the GNOME interface for GNOME 3.0 (2.30). Read on for the details.
Thread beginning with comment 356444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: you know what sucks?
by Hiev on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 17:48 UTC in reply to "you know what sucks?"
Hiev
Member since:
2005-09-27

So what is the sodding argument to re-invent the wheel (*poorly*) again? They could have been finished by now, damnit, and the FOSS desktop would actually be innovative NOW and have a chance against the big boys. But no, they rather waste their time building upon a pile of dogshit.

You know, one of the reasons I don't use KDE at all its for the arrogant mentality of its members, and you do not contribute to it, Don't like GNOME, find don't post in GNOME related topics, I and Im sure many more and sick and tired of your trolling here.

You are always asking for construstive critics for KDE, do the same for GNOME or don't post at all.

Edited 2009-04-02 17:50 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: you know what sucks?
by KAMiKAZOW on Thu 2nd Apr 2009 23:33 in reply to "RE: you know what sucks?"
KAMiKAZOW Member since:
2005-07-06

one of the reasons I don't use KDE at all its for the arrogant mentality of its members

Cut the crap. Until I even reached this thread, I've already read about the "disaster KDE 4", the superiour incremental GNOME development model, etc. several times within these comments.
No much for arrogant mentality of only the KDE users.....

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: you know what sucks?
by Hiev on Fri 3rd Apr 2009 02:07 in reply to "RE[2]: you know what sucks?"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

You just proved my point.

Reply Parent Score: 1