Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Apr 2009 10:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 357091
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Raw computing power
by Laurence on Sun 5th Apr 2009 17:25
in reply to "RE: Raw computing power"
They do have the same computing power but it's usually always more expensive than the cheapest PC with the exact same specs. At least that's true for low end machines.
This won't definitely sway me away from macs but it's a viale argument when you factor cost in. Think about the specs of a mac mini. Any PC is better than that and cheaper. And still I have found a beautiful, silent PC box that could fit just as well under my TV. And to be fair if I did, I wouldn't look at it if it didn't run OSX...
This won't definitely sway me away from macs but it's a viale argument when you factor cost in. Think about the specs of a mac mini. Any PC is better than that and cheaper. And still I have found a beautiful, silent PC box that could fit just as well under my TV. And to be fair if I did, I wouldn't look at it if it didn't run OSX...
Yeah, but this advert wasn't about price, it was about performance.
So my point stands.






Member since:
2005-08-29
They do have the same computing power but it's usually always more expensive than the cheapest PC with the exact same specs. At least that's true for low end machines.
This won't definitely sway me away from macs but it's a viale argument when you factor cost in. Think about the specs of a mac mini. Any PC is better than that and cheaper. And still I have found a beautiful, silent PC box that could fit just as well under my TV. And to be fair if I did, I wouldn't look at it if it didn't run OSX...