Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2005 14:00 UTC, submitted by Timothy R. Butler
GNU, GPL, Open Source Tim Butler knew when he mentioned something negative about the GNU Project's General Public License (GPL), in his column on KDE last week, he would inevitably be accused of arguing the GPL was a bad license. What did not fit into that piece shall now be dealt with: is the GPL a bad license or is the issue he complained about something else?
Thread beginning with comment 3576
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: KDE vs. GNOME
by rm6990 on Wed 13th Jul 2005 15:01 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: KDE vs. GNOME"
Member since:

This should be your own interest. It could be your IT seat that could be reduced one day, because of your extreme views that helps no one.

Lol buddy, chill out. Maybe you should take a second to read the rest of my comment. Or maybe the one I was responding to also. I never commented on which one was better. I was merely answering the question of someone who didn't understand the licensing issues. Do you have schitzophrenia or something? You seem to be really paranoid?

Reply Parent Score: 0