Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Apr 2009 09:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 358702
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-10
Sorry to say this, but if you're going to call the question dumb, I have no choice but to call you dumb
The question specifically makes a point of using the term "Linux distributions" instead of "Linux". Probably trying to prevent some nut from saying 'linux is just a kernel...'
Yes, this is OS news. Most of us know when we talk generally about Linux... we know the difference between a kernel and a distribution. It's especially ridiculous when someone makes a point to use 'Linux distribution'.