Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Jul 2005 14:00 UTC, submitted by Timothy R. Butler
GNU, GPL, Open Source Tim Butler knew when he mentioned something negative about the GNU Project's General Public License (GPL), in his column on KDE last week, he would inevitably be accused of arguing the GPL was a bad license. What did not fit into that piece shall now be dealt with: is the GPL a bad license or is the issue he complained about something else?
Thread beginning with comment 3588
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: license Hell
by Kick The Donkey on Wed 13th Jul 2005 15:14 UTC in reply to "license Hell"
Kick The Donkey
Member since:
2005-07-06

I typically prefer the BPL (Beer Public Licence):

I don't give a damn what you do with this code. However, optional compensation for the author should come in the form of beer from a good, beer-producing country.

Reply Parent Score: 3