Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 24th Sep 2005 19:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 35884
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nothng ground-breaking? How about WinFS (which goes so far beyond Spotlight and the like).
How about, finally, the ability to run remote apps w/o having to go to the TS desktop first, and running the entire Remote Desktop client software.
This is just 2 things.
As for slow adoption, who cares? I for one will run it, as it is a nice upgrade to XP, even beta 1 has some pretty slick stuff that XP can not do (The shells handling of meta data is my favorite thing).
If there is nothing ground-breaking, and it's a yawn, why do you even bother to not only click on the article, but also comment on it?






Member since:
Windows Vista? Yawn... Windows 95 release was more exciting than that. From user perspective there is absolutely no reason to upgrade unless you really want to exercise your hardware, Vista will have even slower adoption rates than XP. As a server platform, there is nothing groundbreaking either. It looks like Windows will continue suffering against Linux on server end and hopefully on the desktop pretty soon as well. Nothing to see here, move along people...