Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Apr 2009 21:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 359827
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by ssa2204 on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 09:32
in reply to "RE[3]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
So, Just because you have no real need for a netbook, don't assume that nobody has.
I don't say that nobody ever has a need, I am merely stating what I feel is a fact that most of these netbooks are an indulgence to say the least.First off nobody needs, they want. Given your example, none really provides a need, merely a convenience at the most. Your girlfriend could easily just write notes on paper, Essays could be better written at a desk or study. And as for keeping in touch with you, that is a convenience not a necessity.
But let's be honest here folks, most of these netbooks are being bought buy tech geeks just eating up the latest fad gadget. Very few people need these, that is a fact. Like the iPhone or iPod, geek toys that provide a self-indulgence, but neither are anything close to being of real need. And I find the argument very weak when considering how light some notebooks have gotten these days, that lugging one around is that much of a pain. And that goes for 90% of people that claim a cell phone is a necessity, it is not, but rather a means for some to feel more important in life than they really are.
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by dagw on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 11:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
I am merely stating what I feel is a fact that most of these netbooks are an indulgence
For most people any laptop is an indulgence. As is an mp3 player, xbox and any other gadget you care to mention.
In fact looking around my appartment I see nothing that I consider a necessity, even the computer I'm typing this on is something I can live without, as is my TV, all my books, my furniture and most the food in my fridge. For that matter I could probably live in an apartment half the size of this one so even this apartment is an indulgence. Any argument based on 'necessity' is stupid and flawed.
But let's be honest here folks, most of these netbooks are being bought buy tech geeks just eating up the latest fad gadget.
I can't speak for the rest of the world, but that certainly doesn't seem to be true from what I've seen. The vast majority of people I see using and buying netbooks are just normal folk who want a small and cheap laptop. In fact at the university where I live I see more netbooks among the humanities students than among the the science and engineering students.
I also know several people for whom a netbook is the first laptop they've owned. They've considered getting a latop before, but always found them to big and/or expensive.
And that goes for 90% of people that claim a cell phone is a necessity, it is not
True, and neither is a home internet connection. But I doubt most people here would be willing to give that up either.
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by aesiamun on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 12:01
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by Laurence on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 12:20
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
I don't say that nobody ever has a need, I am merely stating what I feel is a fact that most of these netbooks are an indulgence to say the least.First off nobody needs, they want. Given your example, none really provides a need, merely a convenience at the most. Your girlfriend could easily just write notes on paper, Essays could be better written at a desk or study. And as for keeping in touch with you, that is a convenience not a necessity.
Seriously, why do you come on a technology news site?
The whole point of technology is to provide a convenience over manual processes. So, given this is a technology news site, your argument is completely pointless.
But let's be honest here folks, most of these netbooks are being bought buy tech geeks just eating up the latest fad gadget.
Got any stats to back up that bold claim, or is it just a guess made up on your part to emphasise your earlier point?
The reason I'm asking you to back up your claim is because my own personal observations have seen more non-geeks netbook owners who were after ultra-portable devices than geeks after new toys.
Very few people need these, that is a fact.
You don't need an internet connection, yet you do have one.
You don't need to browse OSNews nor reply. Yet you did.
If you really beieved non-nessesity technology should be culled, then you wouldn't even be on here to make your point.
Like the iPhone or iPod, geek toys that provide a self-indulgence, but neither are anything close to being of real need.
Self-indulgence drives technology.
If we stuck to the bare minimum of what we needed, then you wouldn't even have a computer let alone braudband internet connection to argue this perculiar point on.
And I find the argument very weak when considering how light some notebooks have gotten these days, that lugging one around is that much of a pain.
But netbooks are still much lighter and more compact. Thus they are more convenient, thus they are more practical and thus it makes more sense for her to buy a netbook.
I really don't see why you don't get this point.
And that goes for 90% of people that claim a cell phone is a necessity, it is not, but rather a means for some to feel more important in life than they really are.
Are you a hippy by any chance?
Edited 2009-04-22 12:26 UTC
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by parrotjoe on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 16:06
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by dpederson on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 17:13
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
Since probably 95% of people only do email and surf the web with a rare foré into writing a short document, the netbook is supremely well suited to their needs. Why lug around a 5-8 lb. item when a 2.5 lb. netbook does everything you need? By your logic, no one "needs" a laptop either. They can use a ball point or wait till they get home to work on a computer. Who needs to work on the train or bus...
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by StephenBeDoper on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 17:39
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"
Your girlfriend could easily just write notes on paper, Essays could be better written at a desk or study.
By that reasoning, any computer or technological advancement could be considered an "indulgence."
Why purchase clothing, when some animal skins would protect you from the elements? Why buy decent cooking knives, when you could just prepare a meal using some sharpened rock?
And as for keeping in touch with you, that is a convenience not a necessity.
Well, yeah - that's how most commerce works: you trade money for convenience.
RE[5]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense
by parrotjoe on Wed 22nd Apr 2009 23:02
in reply to "RE[4]: Without a touch screen Android makes no sense"







Member since:
2007-03-26
This to me sums up the whole Netbook market, these are indulgences or toys purchased for no other reason than to have the latest gadget on the market. They really do not serve any great purpose, nor do probably most who buy one even have a need, merely a want. They are the latest fad for people to just spend money, which is why I just do not find that every bit of news for these toys should be reported on.
Tell that to my girlfriend who bought one for Uni.
* She types lecture notes on it in class
* writes her essays on it on the train
* and even uses it to keep in touch with me (via skype) when away from home with Uni field trips.
Sure, a normal laptop could have done all these, but a normal laptop would also have been bigger and heavier thus a real PITA to carry round as much as she does her netbook.
So, Just because you have no real need for a netbook, don't assume that nobody has.
Edited 2009-04-22 07:39 UTC