Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Apr 2009 15:07 UTC
Editorial Last week, Apple again repeated its claim that the iPhone and iPod Touch are capable of filling the netbook niche. They also claimed that netbooks can barely be called personal computers. Both of these statements are complete and utter nonsense, but instead of writing down some high-level definition of what a netbook is, I decided to simply write down all the things I do with my netbook that the iPhone/iPod Touch cannot do to make the difference between the two that much more tangible.
Thread beginning with comment 360695
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: what? where?
by lqsh on Mon 27th Apr 2009 18:01 UTC in reply to "RE: what? where?"
lqsh
Member since:
2007-01-01

Cook asserted that for many people an iPhone or iPod Touch would be a better alternative to a mini-notebook.


For some mobile users (that don't want to haul around a netbook) an iPod Touch is a better 'alternative'.

Reply Parent Score: 3