Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Apr 2009 23:44 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 360713
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: An OS inside an OS ...
by sbergman27 on Mon 27th Apr 2009 19:41
in reply to "An OS inside an OS ..."
And everyone is terribly excited about this crutch. It seems to be very easy for MS to get people excited about all sorts of crap. Oh well ...
I suspect that Red Hat might be interested in this kind of strategy for their RHEL product. It would add an extra level of confidence for their customers when they upgrade.
In fact, I have a situation right now where I had to *add* an old CentOS 4.x server to run a C/ISAM <-> SQL gateway. We upgraded the old server to 5.x, and everything else was fine... except for this, admittedly clunky, but absolutely key, piece. I might have done things differently if Centos 4.x had been virtualized into CentOS 5.x out of the box.
Just because MS does something does not mean that that something is necessarily a bad idea.




Member since:
2006-06-26
And everyone is terribly excited about this crutch. It seems to be very easy for MS to get people excited about all sorts of crap. Oh well ...