Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Apr 2009 22:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 361177
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
...But still run slower. Windows is simply not as efficient as OS X, which is also not preloaded with a ton of crapware.
I often find that a cheap high-spec machine on paper is still dog-slow because of poor quality harddisk, memory bottlenecks, or simply terrible GPUs.
There is a reason a Mac is one of the fastest computers for running Windows, and it’s not just the spec printed on the box. It is a quality, custom motherboard, chipset & GPU and it is EFI instead of BIOS.
You get what you pay for, and the Mac is still value-for-money in a market of over-inflated numbers.







Member since:
2006-07-25
Yes apple does use x86/x64 components, however as with the great things about the PC industry, there are still varying degree's of quality even with these generic pc parts.
You can't compare a cheap windows laptop with a mac laptop from a hardware perspective. The quality of the components are much higher. From the chipset to audio to casing and keyboard.
As for the topic in hand i think there is a price point for apple to introduce a mac computer in a tower/mini tower configuration. the iMac is a great machine, however i can see why a great many people would like to have a desktop mac without having it all in one, so they could upgrade the HDD, GPU etc. without having to spend ALOT of money on the Mac Pro.
I believe the mac pro would still enjoy sales as most people purchasing this computers are professionals that benefit from having an x86/x64 workstation (i.e. XEON Processors, fast FSB, large total RAM capacity and speed.)