Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd May 2009 09:16 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Thread beginning with comment 361593
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
...I'm still amazed by the fact that more U.S. Government agencies aren't adopting OpenBSD as their O.S. of choice. If the damned thing needs to be secure, why screw around with anything else? It's pretty hard to argue against OpenBSD when it comes to security, because this O.S. is built and coded with this exact principle in mind.
Each operating system excels at something, and OpenBSD is the King of Security.
Each operating system excels at something, and OpenBSD is the King of Security.
I disagree, who would support all the different apps to get openBSD setup as a desktop OS, X, the GUI, all the other apps, openBSD people? I don't think so, I think that might be a worse nightmare to implment openBSD at the time compared to XP.
Sure openBSD will be pretty locked down with defaults and no X, but seriously you think the AF is gonna move their people back to no GUI and retrain everyone?






Member since:
2005-07-06
...I'm still amazed by the fact that more U.S. Government agencies aren't adopting OpenBSD as their O.S. of choice. If the damned thing needs to be secure, why screw around with anything else? It's pretty hard to argue against OpenBSD when it comes to security, because this O.S. is built and coded with this exact principle in mind.
Each operating system excels at something, and OpenBSD is the King of Security.