Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th May 2009 09:42 UTC, submitted by Extend
Thread beginning with comment 361890
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: The Question: BSD on Desktop
by adstro on Tue 5th May 2009 16:05
in reply to "RE[7]: The Question: BSD on Desktop"
The ports themselves are not part of the OS, the framework that manages the ports I would consider to be part of the OS. While calling the framework part of the base OS may be debatable, I do think that the ports system shapes the feel of the OS as a whole and is a major reason people like/hate FreeBSD.






Member since:
2008-03-15
The ports system most certainly isn't part of the base OS, its a framework to install (mostly 3rd party) software from source more easily; I don't think any FreeBSD developer would agree that ports are part of the base OS, they're not even tied with any particular release of the OS.