Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th May 2009 08:24 UTC
Internet & Networking When Google released the first version of its Chrome web browser, many eyebrows were raised over the fact that it updated itself automatically and silently, in the background, without user intervention or even so much as a notice. As it turns out, this has been a brilliant move by Google, as Chrome users are the most likely to have up-to-date installations of their browser, followed at a respectable distance by Firefox users. Safari and Opera trail behind significantly.
Thread beginning with comment 362232
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: No Thanks
by ephracis on Thu 7th May 2009 09:26 UTC in reply to "No Thanks"
ephracis
Member since:
2007-09-23

I would instead prefer auto-updates like Chrome with the ability to change the setting for users who wants to.

Cause we all know that average Joe will go with defaults, and they need updates the most. So to protect ME from spam and botnets, I want all the Joes out there to have updated software. And we will only get that if we just skip asking about it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 7

RE[2]: No Thanks
by MechR on Thu 7th May 2009 09:42 in reply to "RE: No Thanks"
MechR Member since:
2006-01-11

I would instead prefer auto-updates like Chrome with the ability to change the setting for users who wants to.

I, too, would prefer if Google Update provided settings for frequency and notifications. Vote for relevant bugs here:
http://code.google.com/p/omaha/issues/list

(edit: fixed the link)

Edited 2009-05-07 09:44 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: No Thanks
by -APT- on Thu 7th May 2009 10:10 in reply to "RE: No Thanks"
-APT- Member since:
2007-03-20

This is the best solution for most people.

You simply can't trust the average user to update their installated apps, have silent updates as the default with the option to turn them off somewhere deep in the preferences menus. Don't give average users the chance to reject an update, otherwise they might end up constantly ignoring it if they consider it to be annoying.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: No Thanks
by daedliusswartz on Fri 8th May 2009 02:43 in reply to "RE[2]: No Thanks"
daedliusswartz Member since:
2007-05-28

Yeah.. because there's be no outcry if Microsoft did that on Windows....

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[2]: No Thanks
by Brunis on Thu 7th May 2009 11:29 in reply to "RE: No Thanks"
Brunis Member since:
2005-11-01

Even though i personally find it intrusive that software updates itself (even if you turn it off, acrobat anyone?) i find it a nessessity in this day and age that browsers keep themselves uptodate. I will find a way to turn it off, but the average joe won't know or care. So the fact that her/his browser keeps itself uptodate security wise, is a good thing for all of us!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: No Thanks
by WereCatf on Thu 7th May 2009 12:04 in reply to "RE[2]: No Thanks"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

I personally would love for FireFox to stop asking about those stupid updates and just do it automatically. I have my Linux also set up to automatically download and install any updates once a day. I don't need to know about every single update nor do I wish to.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3