Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th May 2009 08:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 362310
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: No user interaction needed, but possible...
by google_ninja on Thu 7th May 2009 19:16
in reply to "RE[2]: No user interaction needed, but possible..."
I set update on windows to go automatically in the background, and I find it kind of irritating when it interrupts my workflow with requests to reboot, or keeps me from doing what I want to do and presenting me with a progress bar.
Chrome doesn't bug me with pointless wizards, useless dialogs, or wait times on updates. It behaves exactly as it should, by default install new updates as they are available, with a way to turn it off and trigger it manually if you are in an exceptional situation.






Member since:
2005-07-06
I have absolutely no real clue what this thread is about, but I gather that you're bitching about the fact that Firefox downloads an update in the background without disturbing you and when you fire up Firefox again you have to wait thirty seconds for the update to take effect?
How do you think service packs work? How do you think hotfixes work? How do you think updates to most software work? You're bitching about one browser?