Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th May 2009 09:41 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 362489
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Unlike the case for Vista, 3D Graphics chips from circa 2003 have more than enough capability to run KDE4 at better-than-other-desktops speed. That is six years ago.
If your system is older than that, then you probably will have a poor result from KDE4.
In order to avoid the Windows tax, I generally buy a motherboard upgrade kit, a graphics card and a blank hard disk when I want a new machine, and I put it together myself. My current system, which is about two years old now, and low-end specification when I put it together, I paid about $200AUD for the upgrade kit, $80 for the blank hard disk and about $50 for the lowest-spec graphics card that I could find that had a 3D GPU. I already had the box, keyboard and monitor.
$50 for a low-end ATI Radeon 2400 Pro graphics card (and I needed some type of graphics card anyway) doesn't seem to me like a bad deal to be able to run kDE really fast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R600#Radeon_HD_2400