Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 13th May 2009 01:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 363209
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Hardware was the same
by GatoLoko on Wed 13th May 2009 02:23
in reply to "Hardware was the same"
RE[2]: Hardware was the same
by weildish on Wed 13th May 2009 02:36
in reply to "RE: Hardware was the same"
RE[2]: Hardware was the same
by kedwards on Wed 13th May 2009 03:15
in reply to "RE: Hardware was the same"
From the article:
"Ubuntu was running on this system via Apple's BootCamp."
I don't know whether BootCamp has anything to do with this results or not, but the system hardware is clearly the same.
"Ubuntu was running on this system via Apple's BootCamp."
I don't know whether BootCamp has anything to do with this results or not, but the system hardware is clearly the same.
BootCamp is just a boot loader(and drivers for windows), it shouldn't have anything to do with the results.
The article was an interesting read, but it's nothing more than bragging rights for a fan boy to say "My OS can beat up your OS."





Member since:
2005-07-06
The hardware used was the same Mac Mini. As least, that's the was I interpret it.