Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 13th May 2009 01:18 UTC
Benchmarks Phoronix, known for their various speed tests and reviews, compared the latest in Ubuntu and what, until recently, used to be the lastest in Mac OS X with 29 different benchmarking tests. Some of the results were rather interesting.
Thread beginning with comment 363237
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Hardware was the same
by kedwards on Wed 13th May 2009 03:15 UTC in reply to "RE: Hardware was the same"
Member since:

From the article:
"Ubuntu was running on this system via Apple's BootCamp."

I don't know whether BootCamp has anything to do with this results or not, but the system hardware is clearly the same.

BootCamp is just a boot loader(and drivers for windows), it shouldn't have anything to do with the results.

The article was an interesting read, but it's nothing more than bragging rights for a fan boy to say "My OS can beat up your OS."

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Hardware was the same
by Lennie on Wed 13th May 2009 08:13 in reply to "RE[2]: Hardware was the same"
Lennie Member since:

I've not seen this mentioned yet, so I thought I'd say it here.

The only thing you could say is, bootcamp might mean same harddisk and certain parts of a harddisk are slower then others, I think the partitions start on the outside and get slower the closer you get to the center, right ? And the Apple softwas was probably installed first. I could be wrong ofcourse, but it is something I did got me thinking.

Reply Parent Score: 2