Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 13th May 2009 01:18 UTC
Benchmarks Phoronix, known for their various speed tests and reviews, compared the latest in Ubuntu and what, until recently, used to be the lastest in Mac OS X with 29 different benchmarking tests. Some of the results were rather interesting.
Thread beginning with comment 363244
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
merkoth
Member since:
2006-09-22

In Linux, and most other OSes, recently used stuff gets cached, hence improving loading times. Just test it with OO.org: the firt time it'll take a few secs to load. Close it, open it again a it'll load almost instantly.

The OSX feature you're mentioning is absolutely about the document-centric approach of OSX's interface, it doesn't have much to do with technical aspects of the OS.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Dasher42 Member since:
2007-04-05

Valid point, yes, but having something cached isn't the same as having it loaded, running, and available to simply run a new window. Even comparing Gnome Terminal with the OSX version demonstrates that. In functional use, even with no terminal windows open I'll have the application running, and a new one is nearly instantaneous to load.

Of course, you could always use XFCE.

Reply Parent Score: 1