Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 13th May 2009 01:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 363293
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: intel on linux isnt a great comparison
by ideasman42 on Thu 14th May 2009 01:35
in reply to "RE[2]: intel on linux isnt a great comparison"
One thing that was obvious from that presentation is that linux was mostly being used for the renderfarms which is nice but not necessarily showing how 3D graphics performs.
Even so I have heard a number of animation studios use linux on the desktop too though this wasnt made clear in the presentation.






Member since:
2007-09-22
I think you are looking for this presentation:
http://www.linuxmovies.org/2008/fosdem.tux.with.shades.2008.pdf
And some people say graphics are shit on Linux. ;-)
"And GIMP doesn't compare to Photoshop", well there is CinePaint ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CinePaint ).
It does things Photoshop can't and "CinePaint originated as a rewrite of the GIMP 8-bit engine in 1998 and still superficially resembles GIMP". But it's a bit specific for it's field.
Edited 2009-05-13 08:34 UTC