Linked by Adam S on Fri 15th May 2009 22:12 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes With the rise of microblogging services like Twitter and Identi.ca, the length of URLs has been the subject of much discussion. Some research has even suggested that long URLs cost us significant dollars, and that by shortening URLs, one could realize significant cost savings in bandwidth. As such, today, we're unveiling OSNe.ws, our own short URL service. OSNe.ws links are currently peppered throughout the site: you can view them by hovering over any news item, any conversation, or at the end of any story via the "Tweet this!" link. Note that these links are 301 redirected to the appropriate OSNews.com page, there is no actual content living on OSNe.ws. We hope you enjoy this new service and that it encourages you to share our links more readily. Update by AS: Because everyone seems to be so focused on the "bandwidth savings" of links, let me be very clear: the new URLs are only for your convenience and saving characters in sites like Twitter, Facebook, and Identica where you're limited on characters.
Thread beginning with comment 363867
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Neat!
by Alex Forster on Fri 15th May 2009 22:16 UTC
Alex Forster
Member since:
2005-08-12

Neat! I don't have much use for short URLs, but I like "osne.ws"! That's how I'm typing it in my address bar from now on.

RE: Neat!
by Doc Pain on Sat 16th May 2009 07:45 in reply to "Neat!"
Doc Pain Member since:
2006-10-08

Neat! I don't have much use for short URLs, but I like "osne.ws"! That's how I'm typing it in my address bar from now on.


Using short URIs / URLs (cf. RFC) is definitely interesting for contexts where you can't click on hyperlinks directly. Written material and even verbally communicated links ("Go visit ...") are such cases. But why does the punctuation appear in such an ungood place? In the past, most URI were formed <topic/organisation/thing>.{org|com|net|<national_suffix>} . Because .ws exists, osnews.com -> osne.ws, but that split the part "news" in "osnews". Woudln't it be better to split it as os.news? I know that's not possible because .news doesn't exist (at least not at the moment, I think). While it's easier to understand and to communicate "oh es news dot com" (as well as "oh es dot news" would be) in a spoken statement (than "oh es nee dot doubleyou es" or even "osnee dit doubleyou es"), it's handy in the case that you need to enter it via keyboard, and it's still readable (allthough "news" is now "ne.ws" which has potential to interrupt the reading flow, but I know that this doesn't matter).

An interesting task would be to write a program that, given a dictionary of the english language, determines all possible combinations of "word" -> "wo.rd" where "wo" is the first part of the given word, and "rd" is a valid suffix. :-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2