Star "Why Linux Is Not (Yet) Ready for the Desktop"
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th May 2009 19:06 UTC
Linux We all know them. We all hate them. They are generally overdone, completely biased, or so vague they border on the edge of pointlessness (or toppled over said edge). Yes, I'm talking about those "Is Linux ready for the desktop" articles. Still, this one is different.
E-mail Print r 7   · Read More · 339 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/gli
Thread beginning with comment 364224
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Wow, what a bunch of crap
by Priest on Tue 19th May 2009 04:56 UTC in reply to "Wow, what a bunch of crap"
Priest
Member since:
2006-05-12

How does the Linux kernel on super computers have any place in discussion about the desktop?

Every time people talk about Linux on the desktop there is some guy defending it and referencing success in totally unrelated areas.

Please don't be a FI.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

TechGeek Member since:
2006-01-14

Priest: I was merely making an observation that the kernel is indeed a very robust piece of software. Someone was making the argument above that Linux was worthless because it was developed in part by volunteers.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2