Star "Why Linux Is Not (Yet) Ready for the Desktop"
Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th May 2009 19:06 UTC
Linux We all know them. We all hate them. They are generally overdone, completely biased, or so vague they border on the edge of pointlessness (or toppled over said edge). Yes, I'm talking about those "Is Linux ready for the desktop" articles. Still, this one is different.
E-mail Print r 7   · Read More · 339 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/gli
Thread beginning with comment 364408
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[11]: Comment by pcunite
by Finalzone on Tue 19th May 2009 19:21 UTC in reply to "RE[10]: Comment by pcunite"
Finalzone
Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes, you can... Now try to explain to a normal a user what is that?

Now explain a normal user the difference between the three types of antialiasing and the three types of hinting? At the end explain to them what hinting is?


Does a normal user care about antialiasing to begin?

By the time you finish, the person is looking to a Windows machine or a Mac. Should it be done different? Of course, people are people, not computer enthusiast, they do not care which algorithm is used or what mode is better for my particular brand of monitor. They just want the thing working.


Obviously a problem with monitor setup, nothing do to with Mac nor Windows nor any Linux distribution.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2