Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th May 2009 22:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 364509
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: OpenJDK not good solution?
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 20th May 2009 08:41
in reply to "OpenJDK not good solution?"
I am just wondering if OpenJDK isn't better solution for Apple users then? Unless Apple's Java is tightly bound to MacOS X, or has special features, I can't see a reason why not to use up-to-date, secure solution that Linux users use.
Soylatte is affected as well on Mac OS X - but OpenJDK6 for Mac indeed is not.
RE: OpenJDK not good solution?
by slashdev on Wed 20th May 2009 15:10
in reply to "OpenJDK not good solution?"
I am just wondering if OpenJDK isn't better solution for Apple users then? Unless Apple's Java is tightly bound to MacOS X, or has special features, I can't see a reason why not to use up-to-date, secure solution that Linux users use. Best, H.
Unfortunately Apple cannot replace their VM investment with the OpenJDK. From what i understand, in the earily days of Mac OS X, Objective-C was not very popular, and seen by Apple as a hinderence. To entice more developers over to the platform, Apple commited to making Java a "first class citizen" on the Mac OS X platform. So there are a lot of Apple only features in the Apple JDK. They also intergrated swing and their aqua interface. As well as little things like spell checking and such. As Objective-C gained popularity, Apple's Java commitment waned.
I suspect because of the OS level intergration they wont be using any GPL'd code, as they dont want to show their source.






Member since:
2006-01-06
I am just wondering if OpenJDK isn't better solution for Apple users then? Unless Apple's Java is tightly bound to MacOS X, or has special features, I can't see a reason why not to use up-to-date, secure solution that Linux users use.
Best,
H.